Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Grotepas

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 29, 1994No. 930311-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge:

Defendant, Calvin Heber Grotepas, appeals from his conviction of criminal trespass in violation of Salt Lake City Code § 11.36.-130 (1990). Defendant contends that the conviction entered by the trial court was the result of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because we conclude that trial counsel’s performance was objectively deficient and that there is a reasonable probability the outcome might have been more favorable to defendant absent the deficient performance, we reverse and remand for a new trial.1

BACKGROUND

In early 1993, defendant was enrolled as a student at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. TennysonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  4. State v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  5. State v. HumphriesUtah Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. VesseyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. State v. StrainCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  4. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  5. Salt Lake City v. GrotepasUtah Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API