Legal Opinion
Hsingching Hsu v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 30, 2016No. CASE NO. SACV 15-0865 AG (JCGx)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
Andrew J. Guilford, United States District Judge
Lead Plaintiff Norfolk County Council, as administering authority of the Norfolk Pension Fund, and others filed this lawsuit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5. Defendants Puma Biotechnology, Inc., Alan H. Auerbach, and Charles R. Eyler (collectively, “Puma”) filed a motion to dismiss the case (“Motion to Dismiss”) under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) (“Rule 9(b)”), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (“Rule 12(b)(6)”), and the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Body Jewelz, Inc. v. Valley Forge Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Loftus v. Primero Mining Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Gordon v. SznewajsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Carve Design LLC v. Slingshop LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.