Heckendorn v. City of San Marino
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
What does the term “ad valorem tax” mean in article XIII A of the California Constitution? We conclude that an ad valorem tax, unlike the tax here involved, is any source of revenue derived from applying a property tax rate to the assessed value of property.
The City of San Marino (City) drafted an ordinance purporting to levy a special tax for police and fire services. The ordinance went into effect after approval by more than two-thirds of the City’s voters. Philip R. Heckendorn, a City property owner, filed a complaint for declaratory relief and injunction, alleging that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- La Jolla Village Homeowners' Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Davis v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Russ Building Partnership v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.