Legal Opinion

Heckendorn v. City of San Marino

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1986No. L.A. 32043PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REYNOSO, J.

What does the term “ad valorem tax” mean in article XIII A of the California Constitution? We conclude that an ad valorem tax, unlike the tax here involved, is any source of revenue derived from applying a property tax rate to the assessed value of property.

The City of San Marino (City) drafted an ordinance purporting to levy a special tax for police and fire services. The ordinance went into effect after approval by more than two-thirds of the City’s voters. Philip R. Heckendorn, a City property owner, filed a complaint for declaratory relief and injunction, alleging that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. La Jolla Village Homeowners' Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Davis v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Russ Building Partnership v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API