Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. State of California

California Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1987No. L.A. 32106PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRODIN, J.

We are asked in this proceeding to determine whether legislation enacted in 1980 and 1982 increasing certain workers’ compensation benefit payments is subject to the command of article XIII B of the California Constitution that local government costs mandated by the state must be funded by the state. The County of Los Angeles and the City of Sonoma sought review by this court of a decision of the Court of Appeal which held that state-mandated increases in workers’ compensation benefits that do not exceed the rise in the cost of living are not costs which must be borne by the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API