Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Transportation Commission v. Richmond

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1982No. L.A. 31403PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (LACTC) may, consistent with the provisions of section 4 of article XIII A of the California Constitution, impose a “retail transaction and use tax” in Los Angeles County with the consent of a majority of the voters, but less than two-thirds of their number.

In 1976, the Legislature created LACTC in order to meet a demand for an efficient public transportation system in the Southern California region. (Pub. Util. Code, § 130301 et seq.) To finance such a system, LACTC was authorized to adopt a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Gordon v. LanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API