Legal Opinion
Mills v. County of Trinity
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1980No. Civ. 18866PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Following enactment of article XIII A of the California Constitution (Prop. 13 on the June 6, 1978, ballot, commonly known as the Jarvis-Gann initiative), the Trinity County Board of Supervisors adopted resolution No. 73-78 providing both increased and new fees for county services in processing subdivision, zoning, and other land-use applications. Plaintiff Mills then brought this action in the superior court against the county and its board challenging the constitutionality of the resolution and seeking to bar its enforcement through mandate and declaratory and injunctive…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Pennell v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.