Legal Opinion

Hanlon v. St. Francis Seminary

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

If the judgment is to be affirmed it must appear that there has been a violation of the so-called safe-place statute. Sec. 101.06, Stats., provides:

“. . . Every employer and every owner of a place of employment or a public building now or hereafter constructed shall so construct, repair, or maintain such place of employment or public building, ... as to render the same safe.” '

A public building is defined as “any structure used in whole or in part as a place of resort, assemblage, lodging, trade, traffic, occupancy, or use by the public, or by three or more tenants.” Sec. 101.01 (12), Stats.

Th…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Supreme Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Holcomb v. SzymczykWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Grossenbach v. Devonshire Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bewley v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bauhs v. St. James CongregationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Lealiou v. QuatsoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Moore v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Gupton v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Perkins v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API