Legal Opinion

Bewley v. Kipp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

We shall state only such facts as are material to the consideration of the controlling question in this case.

The defendants are the owners of an apartment building designed for four apartments. The building was so constructed that no part thereof was used in common. While the four apartments were under one roof they were, so far as their use was concerned, as separate and distinct as would be four separate buildings. The plaintiff was injured while upon the premises which she and her husband occupied as tenants of the defendants. Liability is predicated upon the so-called safe-place statute.

Se…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Price v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Gobar v. Val. Blatz Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Supreme Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Grossenbach v. Devonshire Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Kinney v. LuebkemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Lealiou v. QuatsoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wannmacher v. Baldauf Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API