Legal Opinion

Young v. Anaconda American Brass Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1969No. 265PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issues raised by Anaconda’s appeal are:

1. Was the plaintiff a trespasser, as a matter of law, within the meaning of the safe-place statute?

2. Did negligence of the plaintiff equal or exceed the negligence of the defendant, Anaconda, as a matter of law?

3. Were the damages awarded to the plaintiff excessive?

4. Is the defendant, Anaconda, entitled to indemnity from Ballard for all of the money required to be paid to the plaintiff?

The issues raised by Ballard’s motion to review are:

1. Is Anaconda entitled to any indemnity?

2. Is there any credible evidence that Ballard was negligent?

3. Did the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Springen v. Ager Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Neitzke v. Kraft-Phenix Dairies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Presser v. Siesel Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Mustas v. INLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  3. Wilson v. Continental Insurance CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gross v. DenowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Doyle v. Bowdoin CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API