Perkins v. Young

The defendants raise the following two contentions upon this appeal:(1) That the structure which they erected was a “below-grade garage which did not violate the restrictions of the plat,” and,(2) It was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to , refuse to permit the mandatory-injunction portion of the

judgment to be amended so as to allow the two side walls of the garage to remain and be used as retaining walls for the proposed driveway into the basement garage.

The defendants raise no question as to the right of plaintiffs to maintain the within action for the enforcement of the…