Legal Opinion

Lealiou v. Quatsoe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1961PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

Only a question of law is presented, there being no material issue of fact. The appellant contends defendant’s building was a public building within the meaning of the safe-place statute because three tenants occupied it and the defendant thereby was obligated to maintain safe the second-floor hallway and stairs which were used by the two tenants in common. The respondent’s contention is that the particular place in the building where the accident occurred was not a public building because such area was not used by three or more tenants but only by- the two upstairs tenants.

The safe-place…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Supreme Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Holzworth v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ermis v. Federal Windows Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Grossenbach v. Devonshire Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Paluch v. Baldwin Plywood & Veneer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Antwaun A. Ex Rel. Muwonge v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Presser v. Siesel Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Widell v. Holy Trinity Catholic ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sambs v. NowakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API