Legal Opinion
Ernst & Ernst v. Carlson
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1966No. Civ. 7975PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINLEY, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from a judgment permanently enjoining appellant from unfairly interfering with the advantageous business relations of respondents and their customers.
Respondent Ernst & Ernst is a firm of certified public accountants with respondent Clinton J. McCracken as one of the partners. Appellant also a C.P.A. located in New York responded to an employment offer placed by respondents in an accounting magazine. Following negotiations between the parties appellant was hired by respondents to handle their tax department, whereupon appellant moved to San Diego,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Scott v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Riess v. SanfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Griffith v. Dept. of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Hofmann Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Danjaq, S.A. v. MGM/UA Communications, Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1991
- Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003