Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Dept. of Public Works

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1959No. L. A. 25250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants 1 in an action filed by plaintiff in April, 1955, in his capacity as a resident, citizen and taxpayer of the city of Los Angeles, and as the owner of a contingent remainder interest in real property known as “Griffith Park.” Part of Griffith Park was granted to the city of Los Angeles by plaintiff’s parents for use as a public park only, and part of it was acquired by the city by purchase from the estate of such parents “for park and playground purposes.” Plaintiff by his complaint sought in his first cause of action to enjoin…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Griffith v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Gardner v. StroeverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People Ex Rel. Director of Agriculture v. Paramount Citrus Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Delger v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Chilson v. P. G. IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. National Exhibition Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API