Danjaq, S.A. v. MGM/UA Communications, Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING COPYRIGHT ALLEGATIONS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND DISMISSING REMAINING STATE-LAW CLAIMS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
WILSON, District Judge.
Introduction
In the beginning, harmony prevailed among Bond’s assistants. Danjaq, S.A. (“Danjaq”) produced Bond films and MGM/UA Communications Co. (“MGM”) distributed them. Sixteen Bond films in all, from “Dr. No” to “License to Kill,” were produced and distributed under this arrangement, going back 19 years to the 1962 Distribution Agreement between Danjaq and MGM (the “Distribution Agreement”). But perfect harmony cannot…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Gershwin Publishing Corporation v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., and Community Concerts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- GB Marketing USA Inc. v. Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
- Polygram International Publishing, Inc. v. Nevada/TIG, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- ITSI T v. Productions, Inc. v. California Authority of Racing FairsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.