Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian Church
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment that plaintiff take nothing by its action to obtain, among other things, an injunction against the use of the name “The Rosicrucian Fellowship ’ ’ and declaring the rights of the parties in response to defendants’ cross-complaint for declaratory relief.
[Plaintiff, The Rosicrucian Fellowship, is a corporation formed in 1913. Cross-defendants are plaintiff and the trusof that corporation. Defendants and cross-complainants a church corporation, formed in 1944, The Rosicrucian "fellowship Non-Sectarian Church, Mrs. Heindel, and followers of the rosicrucian…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Smith v. SwormstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Dailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Episcopal Church CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Hester v. BarnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.