Legal Opinion

Rosicrucian Fellowship v. Rosicrucian Fellowship Non-Sectarian Church

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1952No. L. A. 19435PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment that plaintiff take nothing by its action to obtain, among other things, an injunction against the use of the name “The Rosicrucian Fellowship ’ ’ and declaring the rights of the parties in response to defendants’ cross-complaint for declaratory relief.

[Plaintiff, The Rosicrucian Fellowship, is a corporation formed in 1913. Cross-defendants are plaintiff and the trusof that corporation. Defendants and cross-complainants a church corporation, formed in 1944, The Rosicrucian "fellowship Non-Sectarian Church, Mrs. Heindel, and followers of the rosicrucian…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Watson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Smith v. SwormstedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Dailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hannah v. PogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Episcopal Church CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Hester v. BarnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API