Legal Opinion

Hofmann Co. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1988No. A035323PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLINE, P. J.

In statements that appeared in a front-page story in the San Francisco Chronicle and elsewhere, employees of a toxic chemical plant criticized a housing development proposed to be constructed next to the plant. The questions before us are whether the employees’ comments included false statements of fact actionable as trade libel and, if not, whether, consistent with the First Amendment, the statements may nonetheless provide the basis for a cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage.

Statement of the Case

Appellant, the Hofmann Company,…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Swift Distribution, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Westside Center Associates v. Safeway Stores 23, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Kahn v. BowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API