Legal Opinion

Continental Aircraft Sales v. McDermott Bros.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1970No. 68-166 CivPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HERMAN, District Judge.

The matter before us is Hauck Manufacturing Company’s motion for summary judgment in an action which arises from a claim for extensive damages to an airplane allegedly owned by Continental Aircraft Sales d/b/a Flying W Ranch.

As evidenced by the complaint and summarization of the facts presented to the court for purposes of this motion, it appears that McDermott Brothers Company, one of the defendants, sold to Allied Chemical Corporation, another defendant, a large piece of equipment known as a calcinor. The contract of sale between McDermott and Allied called…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Khalil Semaan v. L. Quincy Mumford, Librarian of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. Johnson v. HetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Foster v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Harris v. E. Oostdyk Motor Transportation Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Western Surety Co. v. Town of EvansvilleWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. May v. McCormick by and Through SwallowWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Zelinski v. Pennsylvania State PoliceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Wallace v. John Forrest Kratz Agency, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API