Legal Opinion
Zelinski v. Pennsylvania State Police
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 10, 2003No. 3:CV-01-1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
VANASKIE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Laura Zelinski commenced this action on October 15, 2001, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1988, and 2000e, the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 955. (Complaint, Dkt. Entry 1, ¶ 9.) Ze-linski was employed as a Trooper by Defendants, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania State Police (“PSP”). She claims that the individual Defendants, Corporal Louis Altieri and Trooper Richard Weinstock, exposed her to a sexually…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zelinski v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Kincel v. Commonwealth Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Piehl v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Piehl v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007