Legal Opinion
Khalil Semaan v. L. Quincy Mumford, Librarian of Congress
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 18, 1964No. 18030PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge:
Alleging that he was illegally discharged from his position at the Library of Congress, appellant brought this suit for reinstatement. The District Court granted the Librarian’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action. This appeal followed.
Appellant makes two principal claims. First, he asserts that he was denied certain procedural safeguards which, he says, are required by Library regulations even for probationary employees (now called “conditional” employees). Second, he contends that he was entitled to the *705additional safeguards governing charge of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fountain v. FilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Vestal v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Canadian Transport Company, a Division of MacMillan Bloedel (Alberni) Limited Bocimar N v. V. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.