Legal Opinion

Harris v. E. Oostdyk Motor Transportation Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1940No. Appeal, 257PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, Harry Harris, brought this action in trespass to recover damages for injuries sustained in a collision between a truck in which he was a passenger and a tractor-trailer combination owned and operated by defendant E. Oostdyk Motor Transportation Corporation.

On December 1, 1938, defendant Nevin Myers, on behalf of his employer, defendant Aaron Myers, drove a truck loaded with potatoes to the Smiling Jim Potato Company located at 101 Oregon Avenue in the City of Philadelphia. The manager of the Potato Company, plaintiff’s employer, directed plaintiff to accompany Myers on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Johnson v. HetrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Siegfried v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Mork Et Ux. v. CaslovSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Bynon v. PorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anstine v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Matthews v. DerencinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Kocher v. Creston Transfer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. DeMaine v. BrillhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Continental Aircraft Sales v. McDermott Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API