Miller v. Cote
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
The trial court issued a permanent injunction against defendants’ foreclosing a deed of trust encumbering a leasehold estate on account of a transaction claimed by defendants to trigger the “due on” clause contained in the deed of trust. Defendants appeal (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (f)) and will hereafter be referred to as the appellants.
Based on formal findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the trial court, plaintiffs, hereafter referred to as the respondents, advance three bases for upholding the injunction: (1) the notice of default was both premature and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- System Investment Corp. v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Tomczak v. OrtegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Systems Investment Corp. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Mui Ung v. KoehlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sweatt v. Foreclosure Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Eun Hoi Hwang v. Stearns (In Re Eun Hoi Hwang)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1995
- Houghton v. First American Capital Bank (In Re Houghton)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.