Legal Opinion

Mui Ung v. Koehler

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 2005No. A109532PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Mui Ung gave a promissory note, secured by a deed of trust on real property, to defendant Henry Koehler. Some 11 years after the note became due, defendant, claiming nonpayment, recorded a notice of default against the property in anticipation of a nonjudicial foreclosure sale. Plaintiff filed this action to enjoin the sale, contending that the statutory time limit for exercising the power of sale in the deed of trust had expired.

At common law there was no time limitation on the exercise of the power of sale in a deed of trust. The Legislature…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
  2. Pantoja v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  3. Multani v. Witkin & NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. Rosenkrantz v. MarshallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
  5. Shuster v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API