Legal Opinion

Houghton v. First American Capital Bank (In Re Houghton)

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided February 12, 1991No. Bankruptcy SA 89-08163JBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OTHER RELIEF

JAMES N. BARR, Bankruptcy Judge.

THE PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

In simple terms, I have before me the Debtors’ motion for a temporary restraining order (hereinafter “TRO”) and their motion for relief from prior orders granting First American Capital Bank (hereinafter “the Bank”) relief from the automatic stay in two related bankruptcy cases. Based on the following findings and conclusions, I will grant the motion for TRO and deny all other relief requested by the Debt- or.

JURISDICTION

This court has jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miss Universe, Inc. v. FlesherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. System Investment Corp. v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Tome v. Baer (In Re Tome)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1990
  5. Miller v. CoteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1995
  2. Jauregui v. Ricci (In Re Jauregui)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1996
  3. MacAlma v. Bank United of TexasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API