Legal Opinion

Tomczak v. Ortega

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1966No. Civ. 22410PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

In this unlawful detainer action defendants appeal from the judgment decreeing that plaintiffs are entitled to possession of the property occupied by the Bernard Hotel, 344 Jones Street, San Francisco.

Respondents’ claim of ownership and right to possession is based upon a trustee’s deed executed following the foreclosure of a first deed of trust on said property, pursuant to proceed ings under Civil Code section 2924. The foreclosure sale was held on October 14, 1963 and the trustee’s deed was executed on the following day. The within action was filed on October 22, 1963.

The deed of trust was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. CorbettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Melendrez v. D & I INVESTMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. System Investment Corp. v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Hunt v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Anderson v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Miller v. CoteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API