Legal Opinion

Wellenkamp v. Bank of America

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1978No. L.A. 30776PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*946Opinion

MANUEL,

We address today the question whether enforcement of a due-on clause,1 contained in a deed of trust securing real property, upon an outright sale of that property, constitutes an unreasonable restraint on alienation in violation of California law.

In July 1973, Birdie, Fred and Dorothy Mans (Mans) purchased a parcel of real property in Riverside County which they financed by a loan from defendant Bank of America in the amount of $19,100 (at 8 percent interest per annum) giving the bank their promissory nóte secured by a deed of trust. The deed of trust contained the standard…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API