Legal Opinion
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 30, 2008No. A08-0206PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of her claim for discrimination in the performance of a contract under Minn. Stat. § 363A.17(3), arguing that she has standing, individually, to bring a claim of business discrimination in the performance of a contract entered into between her solely owned limited liability company and a corporation whose managers allegedly discriminated against her. Because under the plain meaning of Minn.Stat. § 363A.17(3) a person alleging discrimination in the performance of a contract must be a party to that contract, appellant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Turner v. AndrewKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Sabri v. Whittier AllianceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- In Re HeckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.