Legal Opinion
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 29, 2010No. A08-206PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*860OPINION
MAGNUSON, Chief Justice.
Appellant Pamela Krueger (Krueger) and her company, Diamond Dust Contracting, LLC (Diamond Dust) sued respondent Zeman Construction Company (Zeman) for unlawful business discrimination on the basis of sex under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn.Stat. § 363A.17(3) (2008). The district court dismissed Krueger’s personal claim and the court of appeals affirmed. We granted Krueger’s petition for further review, and we affirm.
Krueger is the sole owner-member and operator of plaintiff Diamond Dust, a Minnesota limited liability company engaged in the drywall…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Lapka v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- In the Matter of REICHMANN LAND AND CATTLE, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Seagate Technology, LLC v. Western Digital Corporation, Sining MaoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.