Reeve v. Colusa Gas and Electric Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Garret W. McEnerney, W. B. Treadwell, Seth Wellington, J. W. Goad, and William M. Pierson, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action to recover damages caused by personal injuries. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for thirty thousand dollars, a motion for a new trial was denied, and from the judgment and order defendant appeals.
The complaint avers that the plaintiff, a lineman in the employ of the defendant, engaged in the construction of an electric system for the distribution of electric light and power to the city of Colusa and its inhabitants, was directed by the defendant to ascend one of its poles situated at Fifth and Jay streets, in said city, and to attach thereto a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Silveira v. IversenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Peters v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Layng v. Mount Shasta Mineral Spring Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Meek v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Latky v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Reneau v. HirschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Burch v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.