Silveira v. Iversen
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gunnison, Booth & Bartnett, and H. W. Hutton, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This appeal is from an order refusing a new trial. The action is for damages for personal injuries, and plaintiff recovered a verdict for two thousand dollars.
The first point made relates to the sufficiency of the complaint, which was not demurred to.
Plaintiff was employed by the defendants upon a schooner which was engaged in carrying freight in the coasting trade, its usual run being between San Francisco and Iverson’s Landing in Mendocino county, and it was while on its voyage from San Francisco that plaintiff was' injured. The complaint charges “that it was the duty of defendants to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Magee v. North Pacific Coast RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Lane v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Thompson v. Cal. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Bundy v. Sierra Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.