Legal Opinion

Reneau v. Hirsch

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1927No. Docket No. 3376PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant, Eugene D. Hirsch, from a judgment entered against him upon a verdict of a jury in the sum of $20,719, in an action for damages for personal injuries.

The verdict was divided as follows: $18,000 for physical injuries; $2,719 for medical attention, hospital bills and loss of time.

The essential facts are not in dispute and may be thus briefly stated: The plaintiff and respondent, Arnold H. Reneau, at the time he received the injuries complained of, was a minor of the age of seventeen years, employed as a delivery boy by a grocery store in the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Causey v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Koyer v. McComberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API