Layng v. Mount Shasta Mineral Spring Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action to recover damages for
personal injuries. Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against it, and also from the order denying a motion for a new trial.
Does the evidence support the verdict ? A consideration of this question necessarily presents the legal soundness of the action of the court in denying a nonsuit. As to the sufficiency of the evidence, the interrogatory at once presents itself, Was the defendant guilty of negligence, and if so, was the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence ? In the discussion of these questions it must be borne in mind that they come…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Conlin v. San Francisco & San Jose RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Gibson v. Sterling Furniture Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Bjorman v. Fort Bragg Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Longpre v. Big Blackfoot Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- Reeve v. Colusa Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Peters v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Duff v. Willamette Steel WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. NietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929