Legal Opinion

Layng v. Mount Shasta Mineral Spring Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1901No. S.F. No. 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action to recover damages for

personal injuries. Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against it, and also from the order denying a motion for a new trial.

Does the evidence support the verdict ? A consideration of this question necessarily presents the legal soundness of the action of the court in denying a nonsuit. As to the sufficiency of the evidence, the interrogatory at once presents itself, Was the defendant guilty of negligence, and if so, was the plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence ? In the discussion of these questions it must be borne in mind that they come…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Conlin v. San Francisco & San Jose RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Gibson v. Sterling Furniture Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bjorman v. Fort Bragg Redwood Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Longpre v. Big Blackfoot Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Reeve v. Colusa Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Peters v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Duff v. Willamette Steel WorksOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Williams v. NietoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API