Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 26, 2000No. 97-05-28838M; CA A100349PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

This habeas corpus case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Hamel v. Johnson, 330 Or 180, 998 P2d 661 (2000). Plaintiff argues that his incarceration is unconstitutional because he is legally entitled to release on parole. We originally dismissed the appeal as moot, Hamel v. Johnson, 158 Or App 276, 974 P2d 260 (1999). The Supreme Court reversed that holding and at the same time remanded the case to us for a decision on the merits. We reverse the trial court’s decision denying plaintiffs petition and instruct it to order plaintiffs release on parole.

In 1991, plaintiff was convicted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Weidner v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Merrill v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Peek v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Rivas v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Alexander v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API