Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2006No. A120078PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Petitioner was convicted of sodomy and rape in the first degree in 1988 and was sentenced as a dangerous offender on the basis of a “severe personality disorder.” In 2002, the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision issued an order deferring his parole consideration date for 24 months. Petitioner seeks review of that order, advancing two arguments. First, he argues that the board erred in finding that the condition that was the basis for the dangerous offender sentence was not in remission. Second, he argues that, in any event, the board erred in relying on the opinion of a psychologist,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Larsen v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Smith v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. Woodroffe v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API