Legal Opinion
Hamel v. Johnson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 2000No. CC 97-05-28-838-M; CA A100349; SC S46332PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
In this habeas corpus proceeding, ORS 34.310 etseq., the Court of Appeals dismissed as moot petitioner’s challenge to a January 1997 order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board). Hamel v. Johnson, 158 Or App 276, 974 P2d 260 (1999). See ORS 34.310 (allowing prosecution of writ of habeas corpus to inquire into cause of imprisonment). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to that court for further proceedings.
In 1991, petitioner was convicted of two counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405, for crimes that he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Bedell v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Gortmaker v. SeatonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Meadows v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Department of Human Services v. G. D. W.Oregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.