Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 2001No. 97-05-28838M; CA A100349Published

1Opinion of the Court

25 P.3d 314 (2001)

173 Or. App. 448

George F. HAMEL, Appellant,

v.

Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent.

97-05-28838M; A100349

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

Petition for reconsideration filed September 20, 2000.

Resubmitted February 7, 2001.

April 25, 2001.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and David J. Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, for petition.

Before DEITS, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, LANDAU, HASELTON, ARMSTRONG, WOLLHEIM, and BREWER, Judges.

On Respondent's petition for reconsideration filed September 20, 2000.

R…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Edmonds; Dissent · Armstrong.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API