Legal Opinion

Kuty v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1985No. Docket 77198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHood, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from an order partially granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and a judgment which orders defendant to subtract or offset plaintiff’s specific-loss workers’ compensation benefits, MCL 418.361(2); MSA 17.237(361)(2), from the no-fault wage loss benefits defendant is obligated to pay plaintiff. MCL 500.3107(b); MSA 24.13107(b).

The undisputed facts are that plaintiff suffered a severe injury to his left eye in a work-related accident on July 27, 1979. He has a permanent loss of 90% of the vision in that eye. Plaintiff received a favorable decision from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Great American Insurance v. QueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Van Dorpel v. Haven-Busch Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tew v. Hillsdale Tool & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Mattison v. Pontiac Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Rakestraw v. General Dynamics Land Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Rakestraw v. General Dynamics Land Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API