Legal Opinion

Great American Insurance v. Queen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1980No. 62185, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The issue is whether an employer’s or insurer’s right under the workers’ compensation act to be reimbursed out of any tort recovery by an employee from a third party in respect to the same injury which gave rise to the obligation to pay workers’ compensation benefits is modified by the provisions of the no-fault motor vehicle liability act.

We conclude that since the insurer in the instant case seeks reimbursement for payments which substituted for no-fault benefits otherwise payable, there is no right to reimbursement.

We do not agree with Justice Williams’ conclusion that there is "a clear…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Downie v. Kent Products, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Harris v. VernierMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Bialochowski v. Cross Concrete Pumping Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Sibley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Foremost Life Insurance v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API