Legal Opinion

Tew v. Hillsdale Tool & Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1985No. Docket 77853PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShepherd, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals by leave granted from the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board’s affirmance of a hearing officer’s decision denying plaintiff specific loss benefits for loss of industrial use of his right foot. MCL 418.361(2)(j); MSA 17.237(361)(2)(j). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In February, 1968, plaintiff’s right foot was caught in a conveyor. He received loss benefits for amputation of his great toe. The absence of the toe and a loss of bone and tissue from the second toe combined to increase the strain on the remainder of the foot. In the present proceedings, plaintiff…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Great American Insurance v. QueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Redfern v. Sparks-Withington Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lindsay v. Glennie Industries, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kidd v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scott M Cain v. Waste Management IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Nezdropa v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Cain v. Waste Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. O'CONNOR v. Binney Auto PartsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Cain v. Waste Management, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API