Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rakestraw v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2003No. Docket 120996Published

1DissentWeaver, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that a claimant who alleges that he has suffered a work-related injury because of the aggravation of his symptoms “must prove that the injury is medically distinguishable from a preexisting nonwork-related condition . . . .” Ante at 222 (emphasis added). The majority’s holding reads into the statute a new test that the text of the statute does not require.1

The question whether an aggravation of symptoms constitutes a work-related injury is a difficult determination. The Worker’s Disability Compensation Act (wdca) is a remedial statute that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. McDonald v. MEIJER, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Mattison v. Pontiac Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API