Rakestraw v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentWeaver, J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that a claimant who alleges that he has suffered a work-related injury because of the aggravation of his symptoms “must prove that the injury is medically distinguishable from a preexisting nonwork-related condition . . . .” Ante at 222 (emphasis added). The majority’s holding reads into the statute a new test that the text of the statute does not require.1
The question whether an aggravation of symptoms constitutes a work-related injury is a difficult determination. The Worker’s Disability Compensation Act (wdca) is a remedial statute that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- McDonald v. MEIJER, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Mattison v. Pontiac Osteopathic HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.