Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight System

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1980No. Docket Nos. 59454, 61470, 61725, 62782. (Calendar Nos. 4-7)PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

These cases all involve the injury of an employee in the course of his employment while occupying a motor vehicle owned by his employer. Each employee, or his dependents, has received workers’ compensation benefits as a result of his injury. Each beneficiary is seeking to recover personal protection insurance benefits under the Michigan no-fault insurance act. MCL 500.3101-500.3179; MSA 24.13101-24.13179.

The major issue raised by these cases is whether the sole remedy of an employee injured in the course of his employment in a motor vehicle acci*175dent is the benefit allowable under the Worker’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Ottenwess v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Hawkins v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Lewis v. School Dist. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API