Legal Opinion

Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1984No. 68003, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

This case presents still another variation of the application of § 3109(1) of the no-fault insurance act.1

Section 3109(1) provides:

"Benefits provided or required to be provided under the laws of any state or the federal government shall be subtracted from the personal protection insurance benefits otherwise payable for the injury.”

The primary issue is whether a portion of the social security old-age benefits being received by the appellant is the type of governmental benefit which, under § 3109(1), must be deducted from no-fault wage-loss benefits otherwise due.

We hold, on the facts of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith v. Physicians Health Plan, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Profit v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Sibley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API