Worthy v. . Knight
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The doctrine of punitive damages occupies a rather anomalous position in our law.
In the first place, such damages are not recoverable as a matter of right. Hodges v. Hall, 172 N. C., 29, 89 S. E., 802. They are allowable only in cases of malicious, wanton, and reckless injury; and, even then, they go to the plaintiff merely because they are assessed in bis suit. Cotton v. Fisheries Co., 181 N. C., 151, 106 S. E., 487; Osborn v. Leach, 135 N. C., 628, 47 S. E., 811; Waters v. Lumber Co., 115 N. C., 648, 20 S. E., 718.
Second: Punitive damages may not be awarded unless otherwise a cause of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Osborn v. Leach.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Baker v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Baker v. . WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Jackson v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Cotton v. Fisheries Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hawkins v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Shugar v. GuillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.