Legal Opinion

Worthy v. . Knight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The doctrine of punitive damages occupies a rather anomalous position in our law.

In the first place, such damages are not recoverable as a matter of right. Hodges v. Hall, 172 N. C., 29, 89 S. E., 802. They are allowable only in cases of malicious, wanton, and reckless injury; and, even then, they go to the plaintiff merely because they are assessed in bis suit. Cotton v. Fisheries Co., 181 N. C., 151, 106 S. E., 487; Osborn v. Leach, 135 N. C., 628, 47 S. E., 811; Waters v. Lumber Co., 115 N. C., 648, 20 S. E., 718.

Second: Punitive damages may not be awarded unless otherwise a cause of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Leach.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Baker v. WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Baker v. . WinslowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Jackson v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Cotton v. Fisheries Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Newton v. Standard Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Hawkins v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Shugar v. GuillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API