Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ingram

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1975No. 31PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The Commissioner contends that he is a real party in interest or an aggrieved party so as to permit him to appeal the decision of the superior court. He claims that he represents the public interest in this matter and that it has been adversely affected by the judgment of the superior court.

In part, the Facility Act itself provides a guideline to the right to judicial review. G.S. 58-248.39 (f) of the Facility Act provides that judicial review of the administrative rulings or orders of hearings before the Board of Governors or the Commissioner shall be made pursuant to G.S.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Assessment of Additional Sales & Use Taxes Against Halifax Paper Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Gaskins v. Blount Fertilizer CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Childers v. SeaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. In Re MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carawan v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. County of Johnston v. City of WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Selective Insurance v. Mid-Carolina Insulation Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. TOWN OF MIDLAND v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. North Carolina Reinsurance Facility v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API