Legal Opinion

Potter v. Homestead Preservation Ass'n

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1992No. 146A90PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

The principal issue presented in this appeal is whether a partner who can establish an oral partnership agreement governing real property is entitled to recovery in quantum meruit for her contributions to the partnership. We hold that she is not. Her remedies are limited to those afforded her under partnership law.

This is an action for breach of a partnership agreement allegedly governing two tracts of land and, in the alternative, recovery in quantum meruit. As to one tract the trial court entered a directed verdict against plaintiff but submitted her quantum meruit claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carawan v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Eggleston v. . EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. WiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Thormer v. LEXINGTON MAIL ORDER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Lewis v. BolingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Whitfield v. GilchristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Data General Corp. v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Compton v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Miller v. RoseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API