Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber Corporation
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Plaintiffs state the question for decision: “Did his Honor Judge Bundy commit error in continuing the temporary restraining order herein?”
The right to appeal is limited to a party aggrieved. G.S. 1-271. A party is aggrieved if his rights are substantially affected by judicial order. G.S. 1-277. If the order complained of does not adversely affect the substantial rights of appellant, the appeal will be dismissed. Bank v. Melvin, 259 N.C. 255; Ferrell v. Basnight, 257 N.C. 643, 127 S.E. 2d 219; In re Application for Reassignment, 247 N.C. 413, 101 S.E. 2d 359; Gregg v. Williamson, 246 N.C. 356,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- William Falls v. . Robert F. GambleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Gregg v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Yates v. . YatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Grimes v. . AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Gruber v. . EwbanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Carawan v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Atkins v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Barker v. AgeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Oakwood Acceptance Corp., LLC v. MassengillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.