Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Fidata Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 1988No. 87 Civ. 4844(PNL)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
Counterclaim-defendant, the Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., moves under Fed.R. Civ.P. Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6), to dismiss the counterclaims for failure to plead fraud with particularity and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Counterclaim-plaintiffs, Fidata, FTC and FSMI, move under Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 15(a) to amend the counterclaims.
BACKGROUND
The counterclaim-plaintiffs are Fidata — a banking organization incorporated under the laws of Delaware, its affiliate FTC — a New York trust company engaged in the business of providing…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cammer v. BloomDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Casey v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Eaves v. Designs for Finance, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- In Re Blech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Sazerac Co., Inc. v. FalkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.