Legal Opinion
Cammer v. Bloom
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 19, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-2458PublishedCited by 201 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action brought by holders of common stock of Coated Sales, Inc. (“Coated Sales” or the “Company”). The individual defendants include Bruce M. Bloom, Richard Bober, Ernest Glantz, Michael S. Weinstein, Dennis Lustig, and Philip I. Ka-gan (“Kagan”). These individuals are or were high level officers of Coated Sales and, in the case of Kagan, an outside director and attorney for the Company. Other defendants include Coated Sales, now in bankruptcy proceedings, and Peat Marwick Main & Co. (“PMM”), the former independent auditors for Coated Sales.…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by201 opinions
- Teamsters Local 445 Freight Division Pension Fund v. Bombardier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd. v. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PetrobrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- Gariety v. Grant Thornton, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Frances Unger, William Patterson, Lead Gordon Ellis, Lead v. Amedisys Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.