Legal Opinion
Sazerac Co., Inc. v. Falk
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 18, 1994No. 94 Civ. 2330 (RWS)PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Robert Baranaskas (“Baranaskas”) and Ferdie Falk (“Falk”) (collectively the “Defendants”) move to dismiss the Complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in this diversity action brought by Plaintiff Sazerac Company, Inc. (“Sazerac”) or, in the alternative, the Defendants seek to join Takara Shuzo Co., Ltd. (“Takara”) as a necessary party, pursuant to Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
For the reasons set forth below, the Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted.
The Parties
Sazerac is a corporation organized…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Wrights Mill Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- PICCOLI A/S v. Calvin Klein Jeanswear Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Rapoport v. Asia Electronics Holding Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- ESI, Inc. v. Coastal Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.