Legal Opinion
In Re Blech Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 6, 1996No. 94 Civ. 7696 (RWS)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
In these consolidated class actions brought for securities fraud, conspiracy, and common law fraud, each of the defendants has moved separately to dismiss the complaint against it on two grounds: first, for failure to plead fraud with particularity, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b); second, for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
For the reasons set forth below:
1. David Blech’s and Blech & Co.’s motions to dismiss for failure to plead fraud with particularity will be granted…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Gfl Advantage Fund, Ltd., a British Virgin Islands Corporation v. Douglas R. Colkitt Douglas ColkittCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re Blech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.