State ex rel. Rankin v. State Board of Examiners
Montana Supreme Court
Original application by the State, on the relation of Wellington D. Rankin, Attorney General, as a member of the State Board of Examiners, for writ of mandate to compel the said board and Joseph M. Dixon, Governor, and Charles T. Stewart, Secretary of State, as members thereof, to publish notice calling for bids on tbe sale of treasury notes authorized by Chapter 13, Laws of 1921. (Note: Inasmuch as the contentions made by counsel in his' brief, and authorities cited in…
Read the full summary
Original application by the State, on the relation of Wellington D. Rankin, Attorney General, as a member of the State Board of Examiners, for writ of mandate to compel the said board and Joseph M. Dixon, Governor, and Charles T. Stewart, Secretary of State, as members thereof, to publish notice calling for bids on tbe sale of treasury notes authorized by Chapter 13, Laws of 1921. (Note: Inasmuch as the contentions made by counsel in his' brief, and authorities cited in their support, are incorporated in the opinion of the court, it is deemed unnecessary to set them forth here.)
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Galen
This is an original application for a writ of mandate directed to the state board of examiners and the governor and secretary of state, constituting a majority of the board, to compel it to publish notice calling for bids on the sale of treasury notes of the state of Montana and to make sale of same, as required by law.
The state board of examiners is composed of the governor, secretary of state and attorney general. (Sec. 20, Art. YII, of the Constitution; sec. 226, Bev. Codes.) By Chapter 13 of the Laws enacted by the Seventeenth Legislative Assembly in Extraordinary Session (Laws 1921), it…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Stein v. MorrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- State ex rel. Bonner v. DixonMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Diederichs v. State Highway CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Toomey v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- O'Connell v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Kelley v. Baldwin, Auditor GeneralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- State v. GondeiroMontana Supreme Court · 1928
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.